Clinical
Tips
Driving it Home: Applying the History to the Examination
Kim
Greene,
PT, Dip. MDT
You have just finished
taking the credentialing exam and all
that hard work is finally starting
to pay off. Over the last three months,
you have reduced a lateral shift deformity,
remodeled an ANR, and referred a patient
back to the physician for confirmation
that she has MS. You feel like you
have superhuman powers. You have dreams
of opening your own clinic with your
name in lights:
Load Master,
Inc., PT
But there is one remaining
obstacle: EFFICIENCY IN THE EXAMINATION.
You are as efficient as an old Ford
Pinto, assessing only eight patients
a day. How can you be successful at
this rate? What information from the
history will help guide your examination?
Where do you start on the examination
form?
These are all questions that are addressed
during the Diploma Program. Knowing
how to make the examination flow efficiently
requires that you take a first-class
history and then apply it to the examination,
a skill that takes practice. The following
suggestions will help fine tune your
examination, so that you perform like
a Lexus instead of a Pinto.
First and often forgotten,
the postural assessment allows you
to jump-start the examination by assessing
the effect of alternate postural positions.
As those of you who have seen Robin
McKenzie in action know, he frequently
spends 10 minutes assessing the effects
of posture correction. This often requires
adjusting the size of the roll, as
well as changing the location of the
roll or the position of the patient
to get a positive response. You should
also note that not everyone will benefit
from a lumbar roll. If you suspect
a derangement, some patients will need
time to reduce before they can tolerate
any extension. This is often the case
if the patient refuses to sit or presents
with a deformity. Some common mistakes
in this portion of the examination
include:
-
Failing to determine
the location of symptoms before
and during posture correction
- Failing to spend enough time in
the corrected position to accurately
assess effect
- Spending too much time on posture
correction when symptoms are produced
only with prolonged sitting
- Failing to determine if lateral
shift is relevant.
Overlooking the neurological
examination will result in the loss
of valuable
baselines, causing the examiner to
hydroplane. Significantly, you must
perform a neurological examination
before the repeated movement testing,
if the patient describes symptoms into
the extremities. Students often neglect
this portion of the exam, especially
if the patient denies spinal pain or
describes only weakness. Even if the
most distal symptom does not appear
relevant however, you must complete
a neurological exam in order to notify
the physician of a worsening scenario.
Our ability to quickly identify these
patients is an immense selling point
of the MDT method and must always be
on the forefront of the assessment
process. A few reminders when assessing
neurological status:
- A positive tension sign must reproduce
the patient's concordant symptoms
- Greater than two myotome/dermatome
levels warrants concern and should
be communicated to the physician
- The presence of symptoms in four
extremities requires a more thorough
neurological examination
- Positive upper motor neuron signs
cannot be disregarded and necessitates
immediate referral to the physician.
In the movement loss
portion of the exam, therapists frequently
cruise
right through, forgetting to slow down
to
assess important aspects. Documenting
PDM, deviations, ERP and quality of
movement in the pain column supports
classification. With functional activities
such as bending, reaching, and turning,
it is always pertinent to ask the
patient if this is their "normal motion".
Often, this is not obvious to the patient
until the movement is performed. And
if, for example, the patient admits
that she has not been able to touch
her toes "in years", then these notations
should be documented accordingly.
At last, you are in
the final stretch and can start the
repeated movement
portion of the examination. This can
feel as if you are on a roundabout
with no easy exit, as you perform the
test movements like a robot, testing
each movement in the order it appears
on the form. To avoid this detour,
it is crucial to refer back to the
history. The history must guide the
exam in determining starting positions
for direction or load. For example,
if the provisional classification is
an acute derangement and you initiate
repeated movements in a loaded position,
the patient will deflate like a flat
tire. You'll be stuck on the side of
the road for several days until the
patient recovers, morphing Load Master
into Load Disaster.
By contrast, if a
patient is describing a chronic, unchanging
presentation,
you will most likely need to explore
multiple repetitions followed by overpressure
and mobilization to determine classification.
Many students stop testing after 10-20
repetitions and change the loading
strategy or direction, assuming they
have come to a dead end, when in fact,
they could learn much more information
by performing more repetitions with
more force.
And remember that
many patients need time to reduce.
Starting the exam with static testing
often provides the most guidance to
direction, but students starting the
Diploma program often have never utilized
this valuable tool. Simply listening
to the patient and applying the information
from the history will save you time.
Before long, you'll be able to fly
through your evaluations and Load Master,
Inc. will be the talk of the town.
Good luck!
|